A inexperiência de Trump é péssima para os EUA e o Ocidente

trump-putin-g20.jpg

Aaron David Miller e Richard Sokolsky, “Trump is a Bad Negotiator”:

Granted, international diplomacy is a lot tougher than cutting real estate deals in New York, and there’s still a lot of time left on the presidential clock to make Trump great again. But half a year into the Trump era, there’s little evidence of Donald Trump, master negotiator. Quite the opposite, in fact: In several very important areas and with some very important partners, Trump seems to be getting the short end of the proverbial stick. The president who was going to put America first and outmaneuver allies and adversaries alike seems to be getting outsmarted by both at every turn, while the United States gets nothing.

(…).

Let’s start with the president’s recent encounters with the president of Russia, a man who admittedly has confounded his fellow world leaders for nearly two decades. Apparently without any reciprocal concessions, the world’s greatest negotiator bought into Russia’s plan for Syria, where U.S. and Russian goals are in conflict; ended America’s covert program of support for the moderate Syrian opposition, then confirmed its highly classified existence on Twitter; and had an ostentatious one-on-one meeting with the Kremlin strongman at the G-20 dinner, sticking a finger in the eye of some of America’s closest allies. It’s bad enough to give Putin the global spotlight he craves while accepting Russia’s seriously flawed vision for Syria. But to do so without getting anything in return gives “the art of the deal” a whole new meaning. Trump’s failure to hold Putin accountable for Russian interference in the presidential election is the most egregious example of putting Russia’s interests first and America’s interests last, but it’s hardly the whole of the matter. There’s no other way to put it: Trump has become Putin’s poodle. If it weren’t for Congress, public opinion and the media, Trump would be giving away more of the farm on sanctions, Russian aggression in Ukraine and other issues that divide the United States and Russia. That’s not winning; it’s losing.

 

(também publicado aqui.)

4 Comments

  1. Nuno Castelo-Branco

    Não me interessa há muito tempo, insistem no mesmo disparate e descaradas mentiras e isto basta: “ended America’s covert program of support for the moderate Syrian opposition”
    Oposição moderada? Ora, na Síria nunca existiu tal coisa.

  2. MIGUEL

    O Obama foi perfeito a Hilary era perfeita. 
    O Trump tem todos os defeitos. 
    Para isso temos os jornais para nao se ler…

  3. Anónimo

    Convém, apesar de tudo, mencionar o óbvio. Trata-se da opinião de dois empregados do “billionaire philanthropist George Soros”, um reconhecido e insigne anti-Trump.
     
    Aaron David Miller is vice president for new initiatives and a distinguished scholar at the Wilson Center, and the author of The End of Greatness: Why America Can’t Have (and Doesn’t Want) Another Great President.

    Richard Sokolsky is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a former member of the Secretary of State’s Office of Policy Planning.

Deixe um comentário

© 2026 Estado Sentido

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑